Welcome to Sansar

Snapshot_002
A view at The Basilique

Linden have let it be known that the working title for Second Life 2 is ‘Sansar’, and I suspect by ‘working title’ they mean, “let’s put this out there and see what people make of it.”  Whether the name takes or not, it’s a sensible move.  Given that most of the blogosphere appears in agreement that, in retrospect, ‘Second Life’ probably wasn’t the best of names for our current metaverse (it just too easily begs the question, “What’s wrong with your first life?”), giving us an alternative moniker to start using as soon as possible seems prudent.  SL2 is probably years away, but a product doesn’t have to actually exist in order for its nomenclature to start forming: Microsoft stopped calling the tiled interface of Windows 8 ‘Metro’ some time before the operating system’s release, but the name amongst commentators was so well-established that it stuck nonetheless.  Linden probably won’t want ‘Second Life 2’ to become similarly sticky.

Wagner James Au disapproves of ‘Sansar’, calling it a “silly name” and – rather missing the argument outlined above – has called on everyone to continue using the term “Second Life 2”.  Canary Beck takes a different view and has outlined ten reasons why the name might be a good one, including the fact that it’s short, unique, easy to remember, easy to type  and – very importantly, I think – that it’s a word denoting a place.  After all, Second Life is a place we visit.

I’m inclined to agree with Becky.  After my own personal ‘meh’ moment on first encountering the name, it’s already started to grow on me.  Arguably, we’ve adjusted to far more odd words in the past.  ‘Flickr’ might contain within it a sense of what it’s about (although ‘flicker’ suggests to me moving rather than static images), but, to grammar pedants like myself, selective vowel deletion is no way to go about creating a favourable first impression; nonetheless, I’ve learned to live with it.  ‘Facebook’ possibly makes sense to US residents familiar with graduation yearbooks, but to the rest of the world it’s nonsensical; still, its acceptance is now complete.  I even remember thinking, once upon a time, “What sort of a name is ‘Google’ for a search engine?”

If that’s a stretch for you, consider how it must be for people who don’t speak English: they still accept and incorporate these words into their everyday vernacular.  I have a friend in Eastern Europe who doesn’t use Facebook, but still refers to others using it – and thinks it’s called ‘Isbok’.  That gets me thinking about ‘Rebok’ as a name for sportswear that makes no sense to me whatsoever – but I still use it.  And does anyone know what ‘Sony’ means?  Or Toyota?  Or Nintendo?  Or Samsung?

Perhaps my ‘meh’ moment came about because I wasn’t really able to relate to the word.  It sounds a bit summer vacation to me, like sangria or salsa: something potentially fun, but superficial, brightly coloured, mass appeal and transient.  It also sounds like the sort of name a fantasy writer might give to a planet across a series of Goreanesque books (with ‘Sansar’, ‘Forests of Sansar’ and ‘Oceans of Sansar’ forming the obvious first three titles).  It sounds – dare I say it – as though it’s trying a little too hard, a sort of Ed Milliband of virtual world names that wants so badly to be taken seriously but keeps tripping over cables when trying to make a dignified exit (an analogy which will probably be lost on most Americans, since – according to one of them – most weren’t able to tell the difference between the leaders of the three main UK political parties in Thursday’s general election).  I can see why Wagner had the reaction that he did.  But word associations do evolve.

As place names go, it could be worse.  Linden could have employed that narrow-minded preference for familiarity that nationalists seem to be claiming these days as ‘common sense’ and gone for a stronger, harder word that links itself all the more firmly to specific places like Detroit or Dallas or Boston, an attempt to evoke more concretely a sense of place and purpose: this might work to an extent for English speaking countries, but that might alienate the rest of the planet; furthermore, it might create a restricted sense of the sort of thing that goes on in this virtual place to the uninitiated newbie.  Words like that might also come across as a little domestic in feel; a little humdrum; a little dull.  I don’t want the metaverse I visit to be just another place of apartments, offices and car parks: I want it to be a faraway place; a mysterious world; an exotic location.  I want it to be a place which contrasts with my everyday world.  Sansar might feel a little bit coloured plastic on first encounter, but it also carries with it a sense of the unknown and of intrigue.  It sounds like the sort of place I might daydream about when I should be doing work of some description.

As someone who enjoys the sonics of words, perhaps it’s the short first vowel sound of Sansar that makes it feel just that little bit harsh on my ears and reduces its sense of complexity.  For me, ‘Sonsar’, sounds a bit more soothing and sophisticated, though possibly that makes it visually a bit too close to ‘Sonar’, conjuring up to the apprehensive potential applicant issues of Snowdenesque intrusion.  Also, Sansar has a specific meaning: as Strawberry Singh points out, it means ‘world’ in Sanskrit and it would be a shame to lose this semantic.  Perhaps, then, Linden will promote a particular pronunciation of the word which employs a longer vowel sound: think ‘awe’ as in ‘straw’ or perhaps ‘ah’ as in ‘car’.  I’ve not yet heard the word spoken, so it might be the case that it is actually spoken in one of those ways.

And yet, just the typing of this short piece has made the word – just as it is – start feeling familiar to me in a way that I’m starting to become quite fond of it.  Sansar.  Sansar.  A distant world awaiting our arrival: a place of beaches and forests and open plains and castles and floating cities and millions – perhaps billions – of  homes.  A world I might one day step into.  A world I might one day chose to live in.  Yes.

Another reason why releasing this working title into the public domain is clever is it starts making the place feel real.  Second Life 2 just took its first tentative step away from being just an abstract concept.  It’s become a destination.

ANY CHARACTER HERE
ANY CHARACTER HERE

The image above is by Huckleberry Hax and features a view at The Basilique.

Advertisements

9 comments

  1. Very well said, Huckleberry. The name is growing on me as well, although I will still and forever insist that it sounds/looks far too much like Sansa for me to think of anything other than Game of Thrones. ;)

    I’m curious though: if the name really starts to grow on people, will the Lab let us down by revealing that the new platform’s finalized name is something completely different? It’s interesting that they’re careful to classify it only as the “working title” or “internal project name”. Though as you said, they could just be treading carefully to see what kind of reactions they garner. We may only have a (potential) name at this point, but it will be very fascinating to see the genesis of this new platform unfold.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Sansar is also a northwest wind of Persia!! I’m rather fond of the exotic myself! Samsara might be a better word- which root definition is “a wandering through” or else the endless cycle of repetion ( death rebirth) ( yup been there done that! :D

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Interesting insights.. I havent warmed up to the sound of “Sansar” yet, but as a concept, Id definitely prefer a word that is semantically and phonetically pleasing and conjures thoughtful metaphors for SL2, rather than calling it something as awkwardly clunky as second life 2. That just sounds like a weird grammatical mistake. Wouldnt a #2 second life.. Make it Life#3? (And would that come with the weird connotations of “whats wrong with their first life.. It must be REALLY bad if not even a second life was enough that they needed a SECOND second life”)

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s